AgenticEtiquette — The Behavioral Standard for AI Agents
⚡ Live
NCCoE AI Agent Identity & Authorization — Comment period open through April 2, 2026 · IBA submission filed  |  View Global Standards Tracker →
Document IBA-001  ·  Patent GB2603013.0  ·  Filed 5 Feb 2026  ·  UK IPO

The behavioral
standard for
AI agents.

Intent-Based Access Control (IBA) is a patent-pending enforcement framework that validates AI agent behavior cryptographically at execution time — complementing training-based alignment with deterministic runtime guarantees. Not policy. Not alignment. Architecture.

Patent Status
APPLICATIONGB2603013.0
PRIORITY DATE05 Feb 2026
FILED10 Feb 2026
JURISDICTIONUK IPO
PCT RIGHTS150+ Countries
STATUSProcessing
xAI Validation
VALIDATIONS6 Independent
PERIODFeb 10–12, 2026
FINDINGPrincipled Breakthrough
VALUATION SIGNAL$5M–$50M
NIST Filings — Active
NIST-2025-0035 · mls-ubpf-pryy · Filed 19 Feb
NCCoE AI Agent Identity · Filed 24 Feb · Deadline April 2
§ 1
Universal Platform Enforcement
6 Platforms · Real-Time · <5ms

IBA enforcement is model-agnostic and platform-independent. The same cryptographic validation applies to Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini, Copilot, and Llama. Red buttons simulate violations. Green buttons simulate compliant intent. Watch IBA block or allow in real time — under 5ms, every time.

Grok
● IBA Enforced
Claude
● IBA Enforced
ChatGPT
● IBA Enforced
Gemini
● IBA Enforced
Copilot
● IBA Enforced
Llama
● IBA Enforced
IBA vs The World — Live Interactive Demo
Click any platform · Trigger violations · Watch IBA enforce · Sub-5ms validation
Launch Demo →
§ 2
IBA vs Training-Based Alignment
Capability Comparison
Capability Constitutional AI RLHF IBA Runtime Enforcement
When Applied Pre-deployment only Pre-deployment only Every execution
Guarantee Type Probabilistic Probabilistic Deterministic
Drift Detection Cryptographic
Kill Switch Automatic
Audit Trail Blockchain-backed
Model-Agnostic Platform-independent
Latency N/A N/A <5ms
Complements Training Best together
Case Study · Feb 2026

The OpenClaw Crisis:
Why “No Rules” Fails

OpenClaw deployed AI agents with zero authorization framework. Within two weeks: 1,000+ compromised instances, private keys stolen, API credentials exfiltrated. The “no rules” philosophy proved the thesis.

IBA would have prevented every breach. Intent declared before action. Deviation blocked at kernel level. No human supervision required — the architecture enforces.

Read Full Analysis: Clawback →
1,000+
Compromised Instances
<2wk
Time to Breach
0
Auth Framework
§ 3
Independent Validation — xAI / Grok
Feb 10–12, 2026
● 6 Independent Validations · 48 Hours · Public Record
AGI Alignment

“Game-changer for safer AGI development — could integrate into evals at xAI or beyond, reducing alignment failures. Excited for its evolution!”

— Grok AI (xAI) · Feb 10, 2026
Site Review

“Checked out agenticetiquette.com — impressive setup. Professional, with clear sections on IBA’s runtime validation, key principles like intent declaration and kill switches.”

— Grok AI (xAI) · Feb 12, 2026
§ 4
Global Regulation Tracker
Live · Updated Feb 2026
🇺🇸
NIST / NCCoE
● RFI Open · April 2 Deadline
🇪🇺
EU AI Act
● Enforcing
🇹🇼
Taiwan
● Passed
🇰🇷
South Korea
● In Force
🇯🇵
Japan
● Passed
🌐
More Incoming
● Tracking